中国运动员国际体育仲裁胜诉第一案述评——兴奋剂处罚的程序正义问题  

Review of the First Recovering Case of the Chinese Athlete in International Sports Arbitration:The Procedural Justice in the Doping Disciplining

作　　者：宋彬龄[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2011年第2期109-113,共5页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:06BTY013)

摘　　要：国际体育仲裁院最近推翻了对中国柔道运动员佟文的兴奋剂禁赛处罚,这是中国运动员在国际体育仲裁中第一次胜诉。该案明确了程序规则的含义,强调了程序权利的重要性,明确了程序瑕疵的弥补方法,肯定了体育仲裁中禁反言原则的适用。它启示中国体育界人士应重视兴奋剂检验程序中的程序正义,对运动员的法律救助要制度化,建立运动员法律救助资金保障制度,充分利用国际体育仲裁机制。但本裁决在裁决理由上应做更详细的说明。The Court of Arbitration for Sport has overturned the decision of the International Judo Federation which imposed a two-year ban on the Chinese judoka Tong Wen for doping.It is the first recovering case of the Chinese athlete in international sports arbitration.In the award of the case,the panel has clarified the meaning of the procedural rules,emphasized the importance of the procedural rights,made clear of the method to change the procedural flaw and recognized the application of the principle of estoppels in the sports arbitration.It tells us that we should pay more attention to the procedural justice,systemized the legal assistance to the athlete,create the income-maintenance programs of legal assistance for the athlete,and make full use of the international sports arbitration.But the reason of the award should be more detailed.

关 键 词：体育仲裁 程序正义 兴奋剂 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]