检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王少华[1] 匡凤梧[1] 卢仲毅[1] 杨锡强[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属儿童医院PICU,400014
出 处:《中华儿科杂志》1999年第10期591-593,共3页Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
摘 要:目的 探讨有囊气管导管在婴幼儿急性呼吸衰竭中的应用价值。方法 应用呼吸功能监测仪连续监测21 例用有囊气管内导管插管(CETT组)和25 例用无囊气管内导管插管(UETT组) 的急性呼吸衰竭患儿呼吸力学指标,并对比观察插管并发症的发生率。结果 插管当天CETT组患儿的呼吸频率[(36-2±2-2) 次/min] 、呼出潮气量[(9-5±0-5) ml/kg]、声门漏气率[(4-0±1-1)% ]、呼吸功[(0-064 ±0-021)J/(min·kg)] ,与UETT组[ 对应值分别为(39-3 ±2-4) 次/min、(8-6 ±0-8)ml/kg、(14-0±1-2) % 、(0-092±0-035)J/(min·kg)] 相比,差异均有非常显著意义(P均< 0-01) ;CETT组呼吸系统顺应性[(0-5 ±0-3) ml/(cmH2O·kg)]和阻力[(93±5) cmH2O/(L·s)] 与UETT组[ 对应值为(0-6±0-3) ml/(cmH2O·kg) 和(94±5) cmH2O/(L·s)] 相比,差异均无显著意义( P均> 0-05) ;UETT组换管率多于CETT组;两组导管保留时间、病死率、气压伤及拔管后喘鸣发生?Objective To study the value of cuffed endotracheal tube (CETT) in infants with acute respiratory failure (ARF) Methods The indices of respiratory mechanics and complications in 21 infants intubated with CETT (CETT group) and 25 infants with uncuffed endotracheal tube (UETT group) were compared Results The mean values of respiratory rate [(36 2±2 2) time/min], expiratory tidal volume [(9 5±0 5)ml/kg], leak age% around the tube [(4 0±1 1)%] and work of breathing [WOB(0 064±0 021)J/(min·kg)] in CETT group were significantly different from the mean values [(39 3±2 4) time/min,(8 6±0 8) ml/kg, (14 0± 1 2)%,(0 092±0 035)J/(min·kg), respectively] in UETT group on the day of intubation (all P <0 01) The mean values of respiratory system compliance [(0 5±0 3) ml/(cmH 2O·kg)] and respiratory system resistance (93±5) cmH 2O/(L·s) in UETT group were not different from the corresponding mean values [(0 6±0 3) ml/(cmH 2O·kg) and (94±5) cmH 2O/(L·s), respectively] in CETT group ( P> 0 05) The incidence of re intubation in UETT group was higher than that in CETT group ( P< 0 01) There were more accidental extubation, endotracheal tube sliding into bronchus in UETT group than those in CETT group No significant differences in barotrauma, duration of intubation, post extubation stridor and mortality rate between the two groups were found Conclusion (1) The application of CETT in infants with ARF may decrease WOB during mechanical ventilation (2) Improved lung ventilation can be expected by reducing air leak around the CETT and increasing VTexp (3) The CETT was not associated with an increased risk of complications The CETT can be used safely in infants
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15