不同专业化烘烤模式探索——以曲靖烟区为例  

Explorations and practices of different specialization curing modes: To take qujing tobacco production area for an example

作　　者：何亚浩[1] 贺帆[1] 杨荣生 孙建锋 吴中华 宫长荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南农业大学烟草学院,河南郑州450002 [2]曲靖市烟草公司,云南曲靖655000

出　　处：《湖南农业大学学报（自然科学版）》2011年第2期135-138,共4页Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences)

基　　金：云南省烟草公司基金项目(09YN024)

摘　　要：为筛选适合不同生产条件的烤烟专业化烘烤模式,2009年对云南曲靖市现行的不同烘烤组织形式(烘烤服务中心,大户烘烤,散户烘烤)的经济效益、烤烟外观质量和评吸质量、能耗、成本等进行了对比。结果表明:专业化烘烤模式之间的纯收入存在显著差异,烘烤服务中心的纯收入达到2.27×104元/hm2,且烤后烟叶的外观质量最好,所得分值最高,为52.5分。服务中心和大户的烘烤烟叶常规化学成分含量无明显区别,但各类致香物质含量以服务中心为好,评吸质量最优;烘烤各环节的用工以服务中心最低,为19.63个/hm2;服务中心的煤耗和电耗最低,分别为每千克干烟1.58 kg和0.38 kW-h;烘烤总成本以烘烤大户最低,为3 276.32元/hm2,专业化烘烤模式与散户烘烤之间的差异达到显著水平。To select specialization curing modes of flue-cured tobacco adapted to different production conditions,current different curing organization forms（curing service center,curing great family,lambs curing）of the economic benefit,appearance quality of flue-cured tobacco and the smoking quality,energy consumption and the cost were compared in Qujing in 2009.The result showed that the net income between different modes had significant differences.The net income of the curing service center was up to 2.27×104 yuan/hm2;and also the appearance quality of the tobacco leaves was the best,the score was 52.5,the highest;there were no obvious differences between the content of the regular chemical composition of service center and the curing great family,but the content of aroma of curing service center was the best;smoking quality was also the best;the amount of labor consumed in all links of the service center was 19.63 ports/hm2,which was the lowest;coal consumption and power consumptions of service center were the lowest,which were 1.58 kg and 0.38（kW-h）/kg respectively;Total curing cost of the lavish curing was 3 276.32 yuan/hm2,which was the lowest,and also the difference between curing modes and the lambs curing reached the level of significance.

关 键 词：烤烟 烘烤模式 烟叶质量 曲靖烟区 

分 类 号：TS443[农业科学—烟草工业]