检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院,北京100853
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2011年第2期309-310,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:探讨经右上肢静脉PICC置管长度传统测量方法与新测量方法的准确性。方法:将113位欲行PICC置管的患者,作为试验观察对象,PICC管采用美国BARD公司生产的三向瓣膜式单腔导管。置管前用两种方法准确测量长度并记录,要管成功后,均用X光对导管顶端到达位置定位。并记录实际置入长度,将3组数据进行对比分析。结果:测量预穿刺点至左胸锁的长度更为准确,适合。结论:经贵要静脉且应用新方法测量长度,穿刺成功率较高,此种方法切实、可行。Objective: To study the accuracy between traditional and new measuring method for Peripheraplly Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) length via right upper exlremity venous. Methods:Tbere were 113 patients with PICC, which were made by BARD of American Company. The length were measured and recorded accurately before we inserted PICC by these two methods. The top of tube would be located with X-ray when we inserted PICC successfully. The actual length of were recorded, too. These three groups of data were analyzed. Results:The length from the advanced puncture point to the left breast is better and more accurate Conclusions:Through your veins and the application of new methods to measure length, puncture success rate is higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3