学校体育场馆开放后安全保障义务及不作为侵权责任探析  

Security obligations and omission of liability for tort with opening up of school sports venues

作　　者：谭仲秋[1] 

机构地区：[1]成都体育学院思想政治理论课教学部,四川成都610041

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2011年第3期40-44,共5页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：2008年国家体育总局体育社会科学研究项目(1255ss08073)

摘　　要：学校体育场馆开放后发生的问题日益增多,管理者是否履行了安全保障义务,关系到是否承担法律责任。对安全保障义务予以界定,阐释设置安全保障义务的法理依据,着重对违反安全保障义务的消极不作为侵权责任进行分析。违反安全保障义务属于消极的不作为,应在合理限度内对该行为进行否定评价,不应让经营管理者因承担责任而经济上遭受重创。过度的否定将使经营管理者的行动自由受到限制,从而加重学校体育场馆经营管理者的责任,妨碍"学校体育场馆向社会公众开放"政策的贯彻落实。After the schools open their sports venues to the public,problems have emerged.Whether the administrators have fulfilled their security obligations is directly related to whether they are to take relative legal responsibility.Violation of security obligations are omission of liability for tort,which should be negatively assessed within reasonable limit without brining great economic losses to the administrators.Too much negative assessment would over-limit the administrators and hinder the execution of the policies related to opening up of the school revenues to the society.

关 键 词：学校体育场馆 安全保障义务 不作为侵权责任 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]