检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡文木[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学地方政府与社会治理研究中心,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第2期36-40,共5页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(06BSH019)
摘 要:当下撤村建居受到地方政府的普遍欢迎,但实践的效果却远不如政府估计的那样乐观,它不仅在集体经济和个人权益等外在形式处理方面存在诸多问题,而且在内在素质市民化过程中也几乎无能为力。因而提出一方面必须从战略上改变现有的市民化路径———撤村建居,重新选择一条适合城乡协调发展的合理化路径;另一方面,在短期内继续推行撤村建居的地方要加大调整力度,规范操作程序,充分调动农民主动性和积极性,最大程度地保障农民的合法权益。The idea of "transforming villages into communities" is currently advocated by local governments, while the practice is not as good as the governments expected. It has various conflicts between collective economy and personal benefits, and also problems like urbanization of citizen competency. Therefore, on the one hand, we must change "transforming villages into communities" -the current urbanization route from the strategic level, and choose a reasonable mute for coordinated development of both urban and rural area; and on the other hand, for areas that are undergoing "transforming villages tion procedures, fully mobilize the initiative into communities", we must strengthen regulation, normalize operaof farmers and protect their legible rights to the most.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112