论南宋四明史氏家族的史志传记及其争议  

On the Biographies of Shi Family of Siming in Southern Song Dynasty and the Related Controversies

作　　者：夏令伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期15-20,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目"宋代论体文研究"(20100470981)

摘　　要：南宋四明史氏家族号为相门,历来备受史家关注。《宋史》分别为史浩、史弥远、史嵩之、史弥巩四人立传,影响最著,争议也最大。如传主的选择与归类,全祖望认为四人之外,尚有他人可采,钱大昕、赵翼、李慈铭则訾议《宋史》未将史弥远、史嵩之入奸臣传的做法;传文的剪裁与考订方面,行实缺略、隐讳史实、捏造事实、剪裁失当等"舛谬"亦被一一指摘。此外,《宝庆四明志》与《延祐四明志》中的史氏传记也存有争议。这些争议与立褒贬、辨真伪的修传原则有关。Shi family of Siming,highly regarded by the historians all through the ages,is known as an aristocratic family of prime ministers.Four members,i.e.,Shi Hao,Shi Miyuan,Shi Songzhi and Shi Migong were included in the biography of Song History,which were most influential,yet controversies also arose.On the one hand,historians argued about the selection of biography subjects and how to make classification.Quan Zuwang believed that more members should be written,while Qian Daxin,Zhao Yi and Li Ciming criticized that Shi Miyuan and Shi Songzhi weren＇t categorized into treacherous court officials in Song History.On the other hand,many mistakes such as shortage of materials,fabricated facts and inappropriate wording were pointed out.Moreover,some controversies also existed in Baoqing Siming History and Yanyou Siming History.It should be noted that all of the controversies were related to the writing principles of keeping truth and judgment.

关 键 词：史氏家族 《宋史》 传记 修传原则 

分 类 号：I207.5[文学—中国文学]