检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北大学公共管理学院,西安710127 [2]淮北师范大学教育学院,淮北235000
出 处:《心理研究》2011年第2期29-33,共5页Psychological Research
基 金:国家973计划前期专项课题(编号:2007CB516702)
摘 要:本研究采用数字计算工作记忆广度任务和经典类比推理实验范式探讨了工作记忆广度和类比推理之间的关系。结果表明,高低工作记忆广度被试在反应时指标上没有显著差异;而在错误率指标上则表现出显著的差异。工作记忆广度与言语类比推理的反应时与错误率都具有显著的负相关关系,工作记忆广度对言语类比推理反应时和错误率均具有一定的预测作用。研究证实了言语类比推理的工作记忆容量限制的观点。This paper used the computation span task and classical analogies paradigm to study the relation of working memory span and verbal analogies.The results showed that:(1) It has no significantly difference on the index of reaction time between the higher working memory span and the lower working memory span.However,it has significantly difference on the index of error rate.(2) It showed significantly relationships between working memory span and verbal analogies on the index of reaction time and error rate.It showed that working memory span has some predictive effects on the index of reaction time and the error rate in the analogical reasoning experiment.The study confirmed that the opinion of working memory capacity constrain to the analogical reasoning.
分 类 号:B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225