维特根斯坦的语法思想与普通语法思想的差异  

Exploration on the Differences between Wittgenstein's Philosophical Grammar and Traditional Grammar

作　　者：文炳[1] 陈嘉映[2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆交通大学,重庆400074 [2]首都师范大学,北京100037

出　　处：《外语学刊》2011年第2期16-19,共4页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：重庆市社科基金项目"语言哲学核心概念的英汉对比研究"(2010SKZ1014)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文从研究目的、研究途径和研究层面的差异对比维特根斯坦的语法思想与普通语法思想;从两者究竟注重相似性还是差异性、普遍性还是任意性、形式还是意义出发,进行深入探讨。作者指出,维特根斯坦的"语言游戏"、"生活形式"等思想有助于"综观"语言,有助于澄清我们对语法和语言的误解,有助于更好理解语法和语言的本性。This paper makes a comparison between Wittgenstein＇s philosophical grammar and traditional grammar from study purposes,approaches and aspects,and following with some discussions on whether their focuses on similarities or differences,universality or arbitrariness,forms or meaning,consequently the authors propose that Wittgenstein＇s philosophical ideas,such as ＂language games＂,＂forms of life＂,and ＂meaning is use＂,could help us to obtain a surview of language,to clarify some misconceptions of grammar and language,and to gain better understanding of the true nature of grammar and language.

关 键 词：普通语法 哲学语法 维特根斯坦研究 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]