两种检验流感病毒方法的对比观察  

COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF TWO DETECTION METHODS IN INFLUENZA VIRUSES

作　　者：尤平涛[1] 赵秀云[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁夏石嘴山市疾病预防控制中心,石嘴山753000

出　　处：《现代预防医学》2011年第8期1517-1517,1519,共2页Modern Preventive Medicine

摘　　要：[目的]通过两种检验流感病毒方法结果的对比,选择出一种方便快捷、敏感特异、稳定性强的快速检测技术。[方法]通过一起某小学局部暴发急性呼吸道疫情,采集21份样本分别进行现场GICA检测和实验室RT-PCR检测对比。[结果]两种检验方法检测结果差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.42,P﹥0.5)。[结论]方便快捷的GICA法快速检测流感病毒抗原的诊断方法,可作为急性呼吸道暴发疫情和临床检验有价值的筛查手段。[Objective]To compare the results of two detection methods for influenza viruses,so as to choose a convenient,sensitive,specific and highly reliable rapid detection technology.[Methods]Together with a primary school by local outbreaks of acute respiratory disease,21 samples were collected on-site GICA testing and laboratory RT-PCR detection of contrast.[Results]Test results of two test methods did not show statistically significant（P﹤0.5）.[Conclusion]GICA convenient and efficient method could be used for rapid detection of influenza virus antigen,and be used as valuable screening for an outbreak of acute respiratory disease and clinical testing.

关 键 词：流感 GICA RT-PCR 

分 类 号：R373.13[医药卫生—病原生物学]