检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵立新[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《江汉大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第2期44-49,共6页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学重大项目"环境友好型社会中的环境侵权救济机制研究"(06&ZD034)
摘 要:近年来日益频繁发生环境侵害纠纷已经成为影响社会安定和谐的重大因素,成为群体性事件的三大诱因之一。然而从各级法院受理的环境侵害救济案件数量上看,此类权益纠纷进入司法救济途径的并不普遍。对于司法救济机制未能在环境侵害纠纷中充分发挥救济权利、化解矛盾作用的原因,通常被归究于公众的法律意识不强。这一归因的根本缺陷在于缺乏对公众的自主价值判断和话语权的尊重,从而导致对环境侵害司法救济问题的思考忽视了具有决定意义的前置条件。针对公众环境权利意识的调查结果显示,阻碍环境利益冲突走向司法审判程序的因素有二:一是公众环境权利司法救济需求的发现不足;二是司法救济制度供给的不足。In recent years,disputes caused by environment infringement happened frequently and has become harmful factor affecting social stability and harmony and one of the three incentives of mass incident.But few cases of such right disputes entered into the judicial relief procedures according to the number of the cases concerning environment infringement accepted by the judicial departments at different levels.The public poor law consciousness is usually ruled out as cause for the judicial relief mechanism failing to function in solving disputes arising from environment infringement by applying relief right and diminishing disputes.The error of the attribution is the lack of judgment of the public self-independent value and respect of their right to speak,as to cause the neglecting of decisive precondition in considering judicial relief for environment infringement.The investigation result of the public consciousness for environment right shows that there are two factors that prevent the conflicts caused by environment interest from entering into judicial procedures: the insufficient discovery of the demands of judicial relief from the public about the environment right and poor supplement of judicial relief system.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.82.248