静脉输液后两种抬高手臂拔针按压方法的效果观察  被引量:3

Effective observation on two raise arm pull needle press methods after intravenous infusion

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:邓建华[1] 崔淑燕[1] 李梦杰[1] 

机构地区:[1]河北省青县人民医院,河北沧州062650

出  处:《中医临床研究》2011年第7期93-93,共1页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

摘  要:目的:观察2种抬高手臂拔针按压方法的效果。方法:对300例静脉输液住院患者,按2种方法拔针,观察组拔针时尽量提高患者输液手,拔针后放回患者舒适位置继续按压,对照组拔针时尽量提高患者输液手,拔针按压4min后放回患者舒适位置,观察拔针后皮下淤血及出血发生率。结果:两组皮下淤血及出血发生无显著差异。结论:拔针后按压力远大于静脉压,按压后可以将患者的手放回继续按压,减轻了患者的不适感。Objective: To observe the effect of two raise arm pull needle press methods. Methods: 300 patients with intravenous infusion were pulled needle in two methods, trying to put higher of the transfusion hand when pulling out the needle, then putting back into the comfortable position of the patient after pulled needle press for 4min, observing the subcutaneous ecchymosis and bleeding rate. Results: There wasn't significant difference of the subcutaneous ecchymosis and bleeding rate between the two groups. Conclusion: The pressure of pulling needle press is far weightier than that of the venous pressure, reducingthe discomfort of the patients.

关 键 词:方法 按压 效果 

分 类 号:R471[医药卫生—护理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象