检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余娜[1] 杨碧茹[1] 吴春媛[1] 莫琼霞[1]
出 处:《广州医学院学报》2010年第4期89-91,共3页Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
摘 要:目的:探讨结肠镜单人操作法的优越性.方法:通过结肠镜的单人操作检查了1180例,并把后期的300例与传统双人操作法300例的相关指标做比较.结果:结肠镜的单人操作进镜速度,疼痛程度,心率、血压和血氧饱和度波动幅度,并发症等均比传统双人操作法优越,比较有显著意义(P<0.001).结论:结肠镜单人操作技术安全,简便,成功率高,值得推广普及.Objective: To explore the advantage of One Man Method of Colonoscopy. Methods: We had checked 1180 patients by One Man Method of Colonoscopy, and compared the last 300 cases with 300 cases checked by traditional Two Man Method of Colonoseopy. Results: The Into mirror speed, the NRS, the fluctuation range of HR,BP,SaO2, the complication under One Man Method of Colonoseopy were advantageous than Two Man Method of Colonoseopy. (P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusions: The One Man Method of Colonoseopy was safety, convenient, had a high success rate, was valuable to popularize.
分 类 号:R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104