流氓罪废止后原司法裁决效力的宪法解读  

Constitutional Interpretation on the Validity of Judicial Decisions after Abolition of Hooliganism

作　　者：王世涛[1] 汤喆峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《政法论丛》2011年第2期59-64,共6页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：中国刑法于1997年已经废除了流氓罪,但公民牛玉强却将因流氓罪服刑至2020年。从宪法学意义上对本案进行解读似乎更具说服力,即生效判决既判力的相对性,法的安定性和实质正义之间的相互平衡对我国刑法溯及力的影响,公民平等权的特殊面向,形式法治意义下罪刑法定原则的局限性,以及罪刑相适应原则的宪法涵摄。Due to the crime of hooliganism,which had been abolished by Criminal Law of the People＇s Republic of China in 1997,a Chinese citizen called Niu Yuqiang will be jailed until 2020.To interpret the meaning of the case from the constitutional sense seems more persuasive,namely,the relativity of adjudged force principle;what＇s the impacts on the retroactivity of China＇s criminal law coming from the balance between the stability of law and substantive justice;civic equality;limitation of the principle of legality under formal law;constitutional significance of principle of suiting punishment to crime.

关 键 词：流氓罪 司法既判力 形式法治 法的安定性 宪法解读 

分 类 号：DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]