从哲学到政治(上)--“古今中西”之争与政治成熟  

From Philosophy to Politics(Ⅰ)——The Debate about"Ancient and Modern,China and the West"and Political Maturity

作　　者：谢茂松[1] 

机构地区：[1]香港中文大学出版社

出　　处：《政治思想史》2011年第1期53-79,198,共27页Journal of the History of Political Thought

摘　　要：本文以"文化"视角来梳理甘阳近30年来思路中的不变与变化:不变的是他将文化放置于"古今中西"之争的架构下的讨论方式;最根本的变化则是由哲学到政治的转变,此政治是原初性的现实的政治世界。如此对于政治的理解又是与质疑全球性普世化的特殊主义联系一起,这同时也使他对于"古今中西"之争的理解深化,其中的张力得以展开。他由此提出"通三统"说,再进而以社会主义、文化保守主义在排序上优先于自由主义,而社会主义又优先于文化保守主义。由于甘阳个人在当代中国思想学术界的某种特殊位置,通过对他个人的解读,自然也试图理解中国思想学术界晚近30年来的变迁及其背后内在的历史动力,理解中国知识分子重返政治以及何谓真正的政治成熟的问题。Gan Yang,the chief editor of'Culture:China and World'popular in the 1980s,has been consistently concerned with the question——the train of thoughts on culture.From this perspective of'culture',this paper focuses on his thought on two fronts:those unchanged and changed.What remains changeless in that he puts culture in the framework of'ancient and modern,China and the west'debate.The most fundamental alteration is the change from philosophy to politics.The latter refers to the realistic political world.Such an understanding of politics is related to particularism that questions global universalism.It,in the meantime,deepens his comprehension of the debate about'ancient and modern,China and the west'.Therefore,he puts forward the theory of'uniting three traditions'and sorts order for socialism,cultural conservatism and liberalism.And he puts socialism ahead of cultural conservatism,with liberalism at the bottom of the list.Given Gan Yang's special position in the realm of thought in China,this paper attempts to comprehend the changes that took place in Chinese intellectual circle over the last 30years,as well as the inherent hisorical impetus behind them.Besides,this paper also tries to probe into the fact that Chinese intellectuals return to the political arena and shows political maturity in the real sense.

关 键 词：甘阳 “古今中西”之争 政治成熟 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]