刑罚结构的立法完善——以剥夺自由刑为视角  

Penalty Structure Perfected in Legislation——Review from Punishment on Depriving Freedom

作　　者：罗明华[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁530006

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2011年第1期65-68,共4页Journal of Kunming University

基　　金：广西民族大学研究生教育创新计划资助项目(gxun-chx2010001)

摘　　要：在我国刑法剥夺自由刑体系中,存在着无期徒刑严厉性不足、有期徒刑上限过低、拘役教化不足等问题,导致剥夺自由刑的一般预防和特殊预防的目的不能充分实现。为最大限度实现剥夺自由刑的目的,就需要对其进行立法完善,包括:设置25年不得假释或减刑后服刑期不得少于25年的无期徒刑;提高有期徒刑上限至20年;有期徒刑数罪并罚上限根据其并罚总和刑期的不同,实行区别对待;以及设置各种拘役替代措施。In our current system of punishment on depriving freedom,there are some problems,for example,insufficient severity of life imprisonment,lower upper limit of specified sentence,inadequate enlightenment of criminal detention etc.resulting in which the purpose of punishment on depriving freedom in the general and special prevention cannot achieve fully.To realize the purpose of maximum punishment on depriving freedom,it is needed to perfect the punishment legislation,including the convict is released on parole after serving twenty-five years of his sentence,he shall serve a minimum of twenty-five years after earning mitigation of penalty;the upper limit of specified sentence is raised to twenty years and according to the different sum of the term in prison,the upper limit of the offences joinder is treated in different ways,setting various substitution measures of criminal detention.

关 键 词：无期徒刑 有期徒刑 上限 拘役 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]