“辞”非文体论——与禇斌杰先生商榷  

"Ci" Is Not a Type of Writing——Discussing with Mr.Chu Binjie

作　　者：陈广忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学中文系,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《学术界》2011年第4期112-120,285,共9页Academics

摘　　要：《楚辞》,即"楚人语词"。"辞",不是文体名。当今学术界认为"辞"是文体之名,此说不能成立。《楚辞》与《楚词》并举,"辞赋"与"词赋"并称,"辞人"与"词人"同用。词、辤、辭(后二字今简作"辞")本义不同,但是三字古音相同,可以通假。本文考察了两汉至盛唐11种主要文献,论证了作者的观点。Chu Ci,is ' Chu people's language'.'Ci',is not type of writing.It is not correct to consider that 'Ci' is a type of writing.Using 《楚辞》and 《楚词》 at the same time,using'辞赋'and'词赋' at the same time,using '辞人'same as '词人'.词、辤、辭(simply using two 'Ci'as one).They have different original meanings,but they have same pronunciations,so they can be used in the same condition.This article researches 11 main documents from Han to Tang Dynasty,to confirm author's opinion.

关 键 词：“辞”非文体名 《楚辞》 《楚词》 辞赋 词赋 辞人 词人 并用 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]