检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈静[1,2] 谭荣清[1] 郑义军[1] 吉洪煦[1,2] 文康[1,2] 徐程[1,2] 朱玉峰[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院电子学研究所,北京100190 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100049
出 处:《强激光与粒子束》2011年第4期871-874,共4页High Power Laser and Particle Beams
摘 要:针对测量冲量耦合系数的水平导轨法和冲击摆法,分别进行了误差计算和实验研究。计算结果表明:水平导轨测量法的相对误差(4.6%)略小于冲击摆测量法的相对误差(6.1%),其中位移参数和最大摆角的测量精度对于相对误差的影响最大。实验结果表明:两种方法的测量结果基本一致,冲量耦合系数均随着入射脉冲能量的增大而增大,且两组数据相差在6%以内,在入射脉冲能量为3~14 J时,冲量耦合系数最高可达260 N.MW-1。Air track method and impact pendulum method are two common measurement methods of impulse coupling coefficient.Relative errors were calculated and measurement experiments were carried out with the two methods,respectively.The results show that the relative error of air track method(4.6%) is smaller than that of impact pendulum method(6.1%),and measuring errors of the displacement data and the pendulum angle contribute the most to the system error.The experimental results of the two methods are basically identical: the two groups of coupling coefficients both increase with increasing incident pulse energy,and the difference between them remains no more than 6%.The impulse coupling coefficient can reach 260 N·MW-1 for incident pulse energy of 3 to 14 J.
关 键 词:激光推进 冲量耦合系数 水平导轨 冲击摆 误差分析
分 类 号:TN248.2[电子电信—物理电子学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30