论法官指示制度之构建——兼论《最高人民法院关于人民陪审员参加审判活动若干问题的规定》第8条之适用  

Judge's Instruction:Issues Concerning Peoples' Assessors in the Trial

作　　者：周欣[1] 陈建新 聂玉磊 

机构地区：[1]南华大学文法学院,湖南衡阳421001 [2]衡阳市中级人民法院,湖南衡阳421001 [3]衡阳市南岳区人民法院,湖南衡阳421900

出　　处：《现代法学》2011年第2期161-169,共9页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：我国法官指示制度的建立是人民陪审员制度和合议制度变革的需要,是化解现有陪审合议庭顽症的有效途径,也是防止现有陪审制度"平民性"丧失的新路径,对于人民陪审员制度的发展完善具有积极作用。但是,与域外的法官指示制度比较,我国现有法官指示制度具有如下缺陷:粗陋的内容规定、悖反的权威扩张、缺失的救济途径、狭小的适用空间,应从内容完善、权力制约、权利救济、适用扩展四个方面对上述缺陷予以修正。The Regulations of the Supreme People＇s Court on Issues of People＇s Assessors in the Trial,taking effect on January 14th,2010,specifies the directions given by the judge to the people＇s assessors,which,however,have,drawn little attention of the academics and the profession.Establishment of judge＇s instruction regime is to satisfy the demand of ascertaining the people＇s assessors mechanism and improving the trial with a collegial panel,which,serving as a new way to prevent dissipation of the civilian features of jury trial,is conducive to solving the problems confronted by the existing collegial panels and to perfecting the regime of people＇s assessors.Compared with foreign experiences,China＇s existing instruction mechanism has the following defects： rough provisions;contradictory expansion of authority;lack of remedies,and narrow application,and these problems must be solved respectively.

关 键 词：法官指示制度 陪审员 陪审员制度 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]