检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石金彩[1]
机构地区:[1]临沂市沂水中心医院儿科,山东临沂276400
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2011年第7期1000-1001,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的:比较桡动脉与股静脉穿刺方法。方法:桡动脉穿刺、股静脉穿刺采血,记录1次采血成功率,穿刺操作时间、观察损伤程度。结果:1次采血成功率观察组93.8%,对照组82.4%;平均操作时间观察组6.5 min,对照组9.2 min;穿刺部位血肿发生率观察组5.36%,对照组12.5%。结论:小儿桡动脉穿刺采血比股静脉穿刺采血1次穿刺成功率高,操作时间短,损伤程度轻,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To compare the effects of radial artery puncture and femoral vein puncture for collecting blood to improve the success rate of collecting blood.Methods:The one-time puncture success rate and operation time were recorded in radial artery puncture and femoral vein puncture and the damage degree was observed.Results:The one-time success rate was 93.8% in the radial artery puncture and 82.4% in the femoral vein puncture;the operate time was 6.5 min in the former and 9.2 min in the later;the rate of local hematoma occurrence in puncture site was 5.36% in the former and 12.5% in the latter.Conclusion:Radial artery puncturing in newborns for collecting blood has the higher success rate compared with femoral vein puncture,which is easier to be operated with less damage and short operating time,and worth being spread in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.50