检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长安大学工程设计研究院公路院,西安710064
出 处:《浙江交通职业技术学院学报》2011年第1期20-22,共3页Journal of Zhejiang Institute of Communications
摘 要:建国以来,我国兴建了大量的公路桥梁。由于长期服役的磨损及超载破坏等原因,这些已建桥梁部分存在可靠性问题,需对其进行可靠性评估。而在目前存在的多种可靠性评估的理论与方法中选用哪种方法更切实可行显得尤为重要。本文对桥梁评估的各种方法进行了综述,并对各种可靠性评估常用方法优缺点进行了分析阐述,以供科研人员与工程实践人员参考。Since1949,a larger number of highways and bridges have been built in China.Due to the wear of long-term service and overload damage and other reasons,reliability problems arise in some of these built-bridges,which lead to assessment of bridge's reliability essentially.Therefore,it is very important to select a feasibility method from existing variety of reliability assessment theories and methods.In this paper,many kinds of reliability assessment methods are summarized,advantages and disadvantages of usual methods are expounded as well,which can be used for scientific research personnel and practical engineers as a reference.
分 类 号:U441[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31