检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖玖金[1,2] 马红星 王莉[2] 罗丽卉[1] 王坤能 李旭东[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院成都生物研究所,四川成都610041 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100101 [3]四川省平昌县农业局,四川平昌636400 [4]四川省平昌县环保局,四川平昌636400
出 处:《江西农业大学学报》2011年第2期381-387,共7页Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis
基 金:中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KSCX2-YW-G-071)资助
摘 要:选择川东北平昌县农业土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、全钾、速效钾、有效氮、速效磷、有效铜、有效锌、有效铁、有效锰、有效硼和有效钼共13个指标,土壤养分含量统计显示:平昌县土壤养分指标中全钾、速效钾、有效铁和有效锰平均含量高于全省平均值,其余9项指标均低于全省平均水平。与第二次土壤普查农耕地普查资料相比,平昌县农业土壤有效铜、锌、铁、锰含量有上升趋势,全磷和全钾含量呈下降趋势。运用物元模型对土壤养分进行综合评价,结果表明:研究区没有Ⅰ级养分土壤,其中Ⅱ级养分土壤占6.12%,Ⅲ级养分土壤占8.16%,Ⅳ级养分土壤占78.57%,Ⅴ级养分土壤占7.14%。处于养分贫乏(Ⅳ级)和极贫乏(Ⅴ级)的土壤共占85.71%,总体看来,平昌县土壤养分状况较差。13 soil nutrient indicators were chosen to evaluate the soil quality of Pingchang County,statistics analysis showed that: the average contents of Total K,Available K,Available Fe and Available Mn in Pingchang were higher than that of Sichuan Province,but the contents of the other 9 indicators were lower.Compared with the data of the second soil survey of agricultural land census,the contents of Available Cu,Available Zn,Available Fe and Available Mn showed a rising trend,while Total P and Total K a droppint trend.Based on the matter-element model,the comprehensive soil nutrients were evaluated,and the results showed: there was no Grade Ⅰ nutrient soil in Pingchang County,the Grade Ⅱ soil ratio was 6.12%,the Grade Ⅲ soil ratio was 8.16%,the Grade Ⅳsoil ratio was 78.57%,and the Grade Ⅴ soil ratio was 7.14%.The total ratio of soil of poor nutrients and extremely poor nutrients was 85.71%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90