检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大庆石油管理局测井公司
出 处:《测井技术》1999年第3期226-229,共4页Well Logging Technology
摘 要:利用电阻率测井资料判断油气层时,电阻率值法和径向电阻率差异法是常用的两种解释方法。在复杂岩性地层条件下,电阻率值法难以克服岩性、物性和地层水矿化度变化等因素的影响;相比之下,径向电阻率差异法是较为适用的解释方法。但是,由于目前电阻率测井的分辨率不匹配,深、浅电阻率资料不能反映储层径向电阻率变化,无法采用径向电阻率差异法解释。地电模型和实际资料说明,在现有的技术条件下,通过改进测井仪器和采用先进的资料处理方法,如反演,可以得到地层径向电阻率差异。Two interpretation methods, resistivity value method and radial resistivity contrast method, are often used for identifying oil/gas zones with resistivity logging data. As for complex formation, resistivity value method is difficult to eliminate the effects of lithology, physical property and formation water salinity, etc. The radial resistivity contrast method is more adaptable. But, it can not be used because the resolution of current resistivity logs are unmatched with each other and the resistivity data from deep/shallow laterolog cannot reflect the radial resistivity changes of reservoirs. Geoelectric model and field data show radial resistivity contrast can be gained by improving the logging tools and using the advanced data processing technique, such as inversion, thus, laying the foundation for the radial resistivity contrast interpretation method.
分 类 号:P631.811[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117