两种填料在土地处理系统中的应用  

The Application of Two Fillers in Land Treatment System

作　　者：秦霞[1] 王立彤[2] 毛瑞祥[3] 杨雷[1] 杜建光[1] 王岩石[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛理工大学,山东青岛266033 [2]天津市市政工程设计研究院,天津300051 [3]即墨市城乡建设局,山东青岛266200

出　　处：《工业安全与环保》2011年第4期12-14,共3页Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection

摘　　要：选用陶粒和碎石作为填料,在不同的进水水质和水力负荷下,对土地处理系统的运行性能进行实验室模拟研究。试验结果表明:①以人工污水作为进水,在10 cm3/(cm2.d)的水力负荷下,碎石填料20 d完成挂膜,挂膜时间较陶粒填料短。②以人工污水作为试验进水,水力负荷为15 cm3/(cm2.d)时,陶粒和碎石填料的COD平均去除率分别为86.2%、84.6%;水力负荷为20 cm3/(cm2.d)时,COD平均去除率分别为78.2%、75.2%。③进水水质不同,COD去除效果存在较大差异。④陶粒填料表现出略优于碎石的COD去除效果,COD去除率较碎石填料高1.6%-8.6%。In this experiment,ceramist and rubble are chosen as fillers and the operating characteristics of land treatment system is studied in lab-scale at different influent water qualities and hydraulic loadings.The experimental results are as follows： ①When artificial wastewater is used as influent,the time needed for film formation of rubble filler is 20 d at the hydraulic loading of 10 cm^3/（cm^2·d）,it is shorter than that of ceramist;②When artificial wastewater is used as influent,COD removal of ceramist and rubble fillers is 86.2% and 84.6% respectively at the hydraulic loading of 15 cm^3/（cm^2·d）,compared to 78.2% and 75.2% at a higher loading of 20 cm^3/（cm^2·d）;③ Under different influent water qualities,COD removal rates are different;④In the above tests,COD removal of ceramist is 1.6%-8.6% higher than that of rubble.

关 键 词：土地处理 挂膜 水力负荷 陶粒 碎石 

分 类 号：X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程]