检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾克菊[1] 王雪文[1] 钟秀君[1] 陶建敏[1] 朱玉峰[1]
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学岳阳中西医结合医院,上海200437
出 处:《中国感染控制杂志》2011年第2期136-138,125,共4页Chinese Journal of Infection Control
摘 要:目的了解社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)与医院获得性MRSA(HA-MRSA)的耐药特征,为临床经验性选择抗菌药物提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析某院中医外科和重症监护室(ICU)2006年1月-2008年12月临床标本中分离的MRSA菌株资料,并对2个病区分离的CA-MRSA、HA-MRSA及其耐药性进行统计分析。结果ICU分离的87株MRSA来源:痰液71株,咽拭子6株,伤口分泌物5株,血液、静脉穿刺管各2株,胸腔积液1株;其中HA-MRSA占98.85%(86/87)。中医外科的41株MRSA均分离自伤口脓液,其中CA-MRSA占48.78%(20/41),且有逐年上升趋势,由2006年的20.00%上升至2008年的71.43%(χ^2=8.24,0.01〈P〈0.025)。药敏结果显示,HA-MRSA对克林霉素(98.13%)、四环素(98.13%)、红霉素(100.00%)、环丙沙星(100.00%)、左氧氟沙星(100.00%)、庆大霉素(100.00%)的耐药率显著高于CA-MRSA(分别为42.86%、66.70%、33.33%、0.00%、0.00%、4.76%),两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P%0.005)。结论住院患者中CA-MRSA感染呈上升趋势。CA-MRSA与HA-MRSA的耐药性并不一致,对非β-内酰胺类抗菌药物多敏感。Objective To analyze the drug resistance of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) and healthcare -associated MRSA(HA-MRSA), so as to provide reference on empirical antimicrobial therapy for treating MRSA infection. Methods MRSA isolated from clinical specimens from surgical department and intensive care unit (ICU) in a hospital between January 2006 and December 2008 were analyzed retrospectively , distribution and drug resistance of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA were analysed statistically. Results Eightseven'strains were from ICU , the sources were as follows: 71 strains were from sputum, 6 from throat swabs, 5 from wound secretion, 2 from blood and venipuncture tubes respectively, and 1 from pleural effusion; HA-MRSA accounted for 98. 85% (86/87). Forty-one MRSA strains from surgical department were all isolated from wound pus, CA-MRSA accounted for 48. 75% (20/41) , and showed an increasing tendency year by year, which increased from 20. 00% in 2006 to 71.43% in 2008 (χ^2 = 8. 24, 0. 01〈P〈0. 025). Antimicrobial susceptibility test results showed that the resistant rates of HA-MRSA to clindamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin , and gentamycin was 98. 13 %, 98.13 %, 100. 00 %, 100. 00 %, 100. 00 % , and 100. 00 % respectively, which was significantly higher than that of CA-MRSA (which was 42. 860./00,66. 70%,33. 33%0,0. 00%,0. 00% , and 4. 76% respectively), there was significant difference between the two respectively(all P〈0. 005). Conclusion There is an increasing tendency of CA-MRSA infection in hospitalized patients , drug resistance of CA-MRSA is different from that oF HA- MRSA , CA-MRSA strains are usually susceptible to non-βlactam agents.
关 键 词:金黄色葡萄球菌 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 社区获得性MRSA 医院获得性MRSA 抗药性 微生物 合理用药
分 类 号:R378.11[医药卫生—病原生物学] R969.3[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.60.81