检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈辉[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230039
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2011年第1期35-38,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:我国现行宪法关于宪法实施监督的规定,表明我国已经建立违宪审查制度。规范意义上,我国的违宪审查制度似乎已经完善,但制度层面上存在一系列的缺陷:违宪审查主体不当,违宪审查权与宪法解释权存在矛盾,审查内容范围狭窄,违宪审查程序缺失,审查结果缺少强制性,违宪审查制度难以实施等。这些缺陷导致整个违宪审查体系未能运作起来,宪法监督基本上流于形式。Chinese current constitution provides oversight on the implementation of the constitution, and it indicates that China has established the system of unconstitutional review. Seen from the provisions, the system of unconstitutional review in China seems to have been improved; however, in fact the current system still has a number of defects, for example, improper unconstitutional review of the main, the right to unconstitutional review and constitutional interpretation contradict, narrow scope of the content of review, lack of unconstitutional review process, the absence of enforcement ~of review, difficult to implement unconstitutional review system, and so on; and it causes that the whole of unconstitutional review system has never been running, and constitutional supervision is basically a mere formality.
分 类 号:D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143