检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军总医院
出 处:《护理研究(中旬版)》2011年第3期681-682,共2页Chinese Nursing Researsh
摘 要:[目的]探讨脉冲式封管法在胃管封管中的应用。[方法]抽取60例长期需鼻饲的病人并随机分为两组,每组30例,实验组鼻饲后给予温开水20 mL脉冲式封管,对照组鼻饲后给予温开水20 mL匀速推注封管,观察两组病人堵管发生率、胃出血(包括肉眼可见血性胃液及回抽胃液潜血试验阳性)及病人舒适度。[结果]两组发生堵管率比较差异有统计学意义,胃出血率及舒适度两组比较差异无统计学意义。[结论]在病人鼻饲后进行封管时采取脉冲式封管比匀速推注封管发生堵管率低。Objective:To probe into applying pulse-wave mode sealing meth- od in gastric tube sealing. Methods: A total of 60 patients needed tong term nasal feeding were selected and divided into test and control groups randomly (30 cases each). Patients in test group were given 20 mL warm water pulse - wave mode sealing after nasal feeding. Patients in control group were given 20 mL warm water uniform velocity bolus sealing after nasal feeding. Then the incidence of tube obstruction, gastric bleeding and comfort degree of all two group patients were compared. Results:There was statistical significant difference in terms of gastric tube obstruction rate between the two group pa- tients. However, there 'were no statistical significant differences in terms of gastric bleeding and comfort degree between the two group cases. Conclusion :The incidence rate of tube obstruction in patients adopting pulse - wave mode of tube sealing after nasal feeding was lower than those adopting uni- form velocity bolus sealing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3