现有技术抗辩的抗辩模式与对比对象  

Mode of Defence and Target of Comparison in Prior Art Defence

作　　者：翟文峰[1] 张炳生[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期103-107,123,共6页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：现有技术抗辩是指,被控侵权人针对专利权人的侵权指控,可以提出自己使用的技术是现有技术,以对抗权利人的侵权指控进而主张不侵犯权利人专利权的行为。它采用的是权利障碍抗辩模式,依据这种模式,《专利法》第62条应修改为:在专利侵权纠纷中,被控侵权人有证据证明其实施的技术或者设计属于现有技术或者现有设计,该实施行为不侵犯专利权。在实践操作中,应该先将被控侵权技术与涉案专利技术对比,然后将其与现有技术对比。Prior art defense is an act that the accused infringer who confronts the alleged infringement can put forward that what he uses is prior art to counterwork the alleged infringement of rightful owners and claim that he does no infringements. It uses the right barrier mode, on the basis of which mode, article 62 of the Patent Law should be revised as follows： in dispute of patent infringement, if the accused infringer has evidence that can prove what he uses are prior arts or prior designs, what he does is not infringement act. In practice, we must first compare the accused art with the implicated patent technology, then with prior arts.

关 键 词：现有技术抗辩 抗辩模式 涉案专利 对比对象 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]