检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周燕斌[1] 谢灿茂[1] 吴俊景[1] 曾勉[1] 张孔[1]
机构地区:[1]中山医科大学附属第一医院呼吸内科,510080
出 处:《新医学》1999年第8期443-444,共2页Journal of New Medicine
摘 要:目的 :进一步观察和评价头孢羟氨苄胶囊 (赛锋 )对急性呼吸道感染的临床有效性和安全性。方法 :选择急性呼吸道感染患者 60例 ,随机分成两组 ,分别给予头孢羟氨苄胶囊和头孢克洛口服治疗 ,从临床表现及实验室检验两方面对其疗效和安全性进行对比评价。结果 :头孢羟氨苄胶囊治疗急性呼吸道感染的临床有效率为 80 % ,痰分离致病菌的药敏率 89% ,细菌清除率为 84 % ,头孢克洛则分别为 73 % ,82 % ,74 % ,差异均无显著性 ( P>0 .0 5 )。前者不良反应的发生率 ( 6% )较后者 ( 17% )低。结论Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefadroxil in the treatment of acute respiratory infection Methods: 60 patients with acute respiratory infection were randomly assigned into 2 groups: cefradroxil treated group and cefaclor treated group Clinical manifestations and laboratory profiles were compared Results: The effective rate, drug sensitivity rate of sputum isolated pathogen and bacteria eradication rate were 80%,89% and 84% respectively in cefadroxil group; while the counterpart indecies were 73%, 82% and 74% respectively in cefaclor group No significantly difference between the 2 groups ( P >0 05) was found But the incidence of side effect was lower in cefadroxil group (6%) than that in cefaclor group (17%) Conclusion: Cefadroxil is a safe and effective oral antibiotic for treatment of acute respiratory infection
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28