检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄璇[1] 李咏茵[1] 胡小雄[1] 张明霞[1] 唐利波[1] 马世武[1,2] 侯金林[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院感染内科,广州510515 [2]成都军区昆明总医院感染科
出 处:《中国病毒病杂志》2011年第1期41-44,共4页Chinese Journal of Viral Diseases
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30730082;30901271);南方医院院长基金(2009C009)
摘 要:目的比较两种常规免疫学检测方法检测慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(CHB)患者血清白细胞介素-21(IL-21)表达水平的差异。方法选择24例CHB患者(HBV DNA≥5 lg拷贝/ml、ALT≥40 U/L)以及12例健康献血者(HBsAg阴性、ALT<40 U/L),应用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和细胞计数微球芯片技术(CBA)检测血清IL-21的水平,其中20份血清同时进行了两种方法检测。结果 ELISA法检测发现,CHB患者血清IL-21平均浓度为(96.4±9.2)ng/L,12例健康对照者为(27.9±7.5)ng/L,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.000 5),HBeAg阳性[(88.9±9.3)ng/L,n=12]和HBeAg阴性[(103.9±16.0)ng/L,n=12]CHB患者血清IL-21浓度差异无统计学意义(P=0.665 0),但均显著高于健康人群[(27.9±7.5)ng/L,n=12](P=0.005 1,P=0.001 7)。ELISA法检测结果显著高于CBA法[(96.0±10.2)ng/Lvs(68.2±6.1)ng/L,P=0.013 0]。结论选择不同的方法检测血清IL-21浓度存在一定的差异;CHB患者血清高水平表达IL-21可能与慢性乙型肝炎的发病机制有关。Objective To measure the concentration of serum interleukin-21(IL-21)in chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients with two different immunological assays.Methods Twenty-four CHB patients(HBV DNA≥105 copies/ml,ALT≥40 U/L) and 12 healthy volunteers participated the study.The serum concentration of IL-21 was analyzed by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) and/or a cytometry beads array(CBA) test.Results There were 12 CHB patients with positive HBeAg testing result.The serum concentration of IL-21 was significantly higher in CHB patients [(96.4±9.2)ng/L,ELISA] than that in healthy volunteers [(27.9±7.5)ng/L,ELISA](P0.05).There was no difference in the serum concentrations of IL-21 between HBeAg-positive[(88.9±9.3) ng/L,n=12]and negative[(103.9±16.0)ng/L,n=12]CHB patients.The value of IL-21 was significantly higher by the method of ELISA assay[(96.0±10.2)ng/L]than that by CBA test[(68.2±6.1)ng/L](P=0.013 0).Conclusions CHB patients had a higher level of IL-21 expression than healthy volunteers.The difference might be associated with the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B.The value of serum IL-21 concentration was significant higher by the assay of ELISA than that by the method of CBA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.141.66