检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周箭[1] 陈蓉[1] 郭海鹰[1] 郑琳[1] 王小渝[1]
机构地区:[1]成都市第三人民医院血液科,四川成都610031
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2011年第4期19-20,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:对比HA/HAG方案治疗老年急性髓细胞白血病(AHL)的临床疗效。方法:将38例AML患者随机分成UA组(18例)与HAG组(20例)分别使用以上2种方案进行化疗,比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应。结果:与HA组比较HAG组完全缓解率高,骨髓抑制时间短,不良反应发生率及早期死亡率有明显降低,总有效率7 5.0%。结论:HAG方案治疗老年急性髓细胞白血病疗效较好,毒副反应轻,结合个体化治疗方案疗效将更理想。Objective: To contrast MA / HAG in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) the clinical efficacy. Methods : The 38 cases of AML were randomly divided intoMAgroup (18 cases) and HAG group (20 the clinical efficacy. Methods : The 38 cases of AML were randomly divided intoMAgroup (18 cases) and HAG group (20 cases) 2 using the above programs were chemotherapy, Two groups were compared the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions. Results : HAG MA compared with complete remission rate, Bone marrow suppression time was short, adverse reaction rates and early mortality was significantly reduced, The total effective rate 75.0%. Conclusion : HAG in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myelogenous leukemia should be better, mild toxicity, combined with more effect ive individualized treatment plan ideal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222