检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学附属曙光医院,上海200021
出 处:《海南医学》2011年第9期145-146,共2页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨提高老年患者静脉穿刺成功率的方法。方法选择在我院内科住院接受静脉输液治疗的老年患者1200例,随机分为试验组和对照组,每组600例,分别采用手放松法和手握拳进行手背静脉穿刺,比较两组患者首次静脉穿刺成功率和穿刺时疼痛程度。结果试验组的穿刺成功率高于对照组,而疼痛程度低于对照组,差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用手放松法对老年患者进行手背静脉穿刺,可以提高穿刺成功率,减轻患者痛苦,是理想的静脉穿刺法。Objective To discuss successful rate of venipunctures on back of the hand for old patients.Methods 1 200 old patients were randomized to receive venipuncture on the back of the hand with hand slackening method(HSM group;n= 600) and clenching fist method(CFM group;n= 600).To compare venipuncture successful rate and pain level of the two teams.Results Venipuncture success rate of HSM group is higher than CFM group while pain level lower than CFM group.Conclusion HSM is a good venipuncture method,with high successful rate and low pain level.Venipuncture successful rate of HSM group was higher than that in CFM group,and pain level lower than that in CFM group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117