出 处:《中国医药》2011年第5期552-554,共3页China Medicine
摘 要:目的观察强化血糖控制对糖尿病伴急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后心肌组织灌注及心室功能的影响。方法68例2型糖尿病伴AMI患者完全随机分为糖尿病常规治疗组(34例)和糖尿病强化治疗组(34例),并以69例糖耐量正常NGT的AMI患者为NGT对照组。常规治疗为诺和灵30R皮下注射,维持血糖在8.0—11.1mmol/L;强化治疗为静脉滴注胰岛素和(或)胰岛素泵治疗,维持血糖在4.4—6.1mmol/L。所有患者均于发病后24h内行PCI,治疗后行心肌呈色分级(MBG),评价心肌微循环灌注情况,并于术后1周及1个月行心脏超声心动图检查,分别测定左心室射血分数、心指数,评价心室功能。结果3组患者PCI术后心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)3级的比率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),糖尿病常规治疗组和糖尿病强化治疗组患者MBG2~3级比例均明显低于NGT对照组(64.7%,82.3%比94.2%,均P〈0.01),PCI术后1周和1个月时睹尿病强化治疗细心指数明显高于糖尿病常规治疗组[(3.17±0.42)L/(min·m2)比(2.62±0.43)L/(min·m2),(3.85±0.51)L/(min·m2)比(3.14±0.57)L/(min·m2),P〈0.05],而糖尿病强化治疗组心指数和NGT对照组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);3组患者术后1周与术后1个月比较心指数均改善且差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);NGT对照组左心室射血分数高于糖尿病常规治疗组和糖尿病强化治疗组(P〈0.01),PCI术后1个月NGT对照组和糖尿病强化治疗组左心室射血分数较术后1周时明显改善(P〈0.05),糖尿病常规治疗组亦有一定改善,但差异无统计学意义。结论强化血糖控制可明显改善糖尿病伴AMI患者急诊PCI术后的心肌组织灌注及心室功能。Objective To examine the effects of intensive glucose control on myocardial tissue perfusion and ventrlcular function in post-percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) diabetes mellitus(DM) patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods Sixty-eight DM patients with AMI were divided into two groups: DM rou- tine treatment group( n = 34 ) and DM intensive treatment group( n = 34 ), and 69 AMI patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) as NGT control group. DM routine treatment group were treated with novolin 30R, to maintain blood glucose in 8.0- 11.1 retool/L; DM intensive treatment group were treated with insulin, and(or) insulin pump, to maintain blood glucose in 4.4 ~ 6. 1 mmol/L. All patients underwent emergency coronary angiography af- ter PCI. We estimated the myocardial tissue perfusion according to the myocardial blush grade(MBG). The left ven- trlcular ejection fraetio(LVEF) and cardiac index(CI) were measured in all patients at 1 week and 1 month after PCI to estimate ventricular function. Results There was no significant difference in TIMI Grade 3 after PCI among three groups(P 〉0.05 ) , and the percentage of efficient reperfusion in DM group was significantly lower than NGT control groups(04.7% ,82.3% vs 94.2% , P 〈0. O1 ). The CI value was much higher in NGT intensive treatment group than DM routine treatment group( P 〈 0.01 ), and there was no significant difference between DM intensive treatment group and NGT control group at 1 week and 1 month after PCI (P 〉 0. 05), but the CI value was signifi- cantly improved in all three groups at 1 month than at 1 week after PCI(P 〈0.05). The LVEF was much higher in NGT control group than DM groups(p 〈0.01 ) , and significantly improved in NGT control group and DM intensive treatment group at 1 month than at 1 week after PCI(P 〈0.05) ,but there was no significant improved in DM routine treatment group(P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Intensive glucose control may significa
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...