两种吸痰方法对下呼吸道感染者血气分析影响的对比研究  

Effects of blood gas with two different suction ways on patients with lower respiratory trail infection

作　　者：曹坤跃[1] 施学进[1] 

机构地区：[1]泗洪县人民医院,江苏泗洪223900

出　　处：《临床肺科杂志》2011年第6期884-885,共2页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较常规吸痰和麻醉喉镜暴露声门后吸痰两种方法对下呼吸道感染患者血气分析的影响。方法 61例患者随机分为两组,对照组31例,实验组30例。对照组以普通吸痰管吸痰,实验组以麻醉喉镜暴露声门后普通吸痰管吸痰,吸痰前和吸痰后30 min分别对患者进行血气分析检查。结果对照组吸痰前后血气分析结果无差异(P>0.05),而实验组显示吸痰后血气分析结果较吸痰前改善(P<0.05)。结论麻醉喉镜暴露声门后吸痰的方法可改善下呼吸道感染患者血气分析。Objective To explore the effects of blood gas with two different suction ways on patients with lower respiratory trail infection.Methods 61 patients were randomly divided into two groups,31 patients in control group and 30 patients in experimental group.The conventional suctioning was employed in control group,while the endotracheal suction was used via the glottis exposed by an anesthesia laryngoscope in experimental group.The values of blood gas in all subjects were measured before and 30 minutes after suctioning.Results In control group,there was no difference in blood gas analysis before and after suctioning（P〉0.05）.In experimental group there was significant improved by an anesthesia laryngoscope（P〈0.05）.Conclusion With an anesthesia laryngoscope exposing the glottis,the endotracheal suctioning may evidently improve the blood gas analysis in patients with lower respiratory trail infection.

关 键 词：麻醉喉镜 吸痰 下呼吸道感染 血气分析 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]