检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑节霞[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医学院,温州325035
出 处:《医学与社会》2011年第2期97-99,共3页Medicine and Society
基 金:温州市大学生心理健康科研项目;项目编号为wxxy09012
摘 要:目的:为高校有针对性地开展贫困生心理健康教育工作,提供指导。方法:本研究采用自尊量表,一般自我效能感量表,以及应对方式量表对医学院校贫困生进行问卷调查。结果:贫困生与非贫困生在自尊、自我效能感的差异无统计学意义;自尊水平和自我效能感越高的贫困生越倾向于采用求助、合理化以及解决问题等成熟的积极的应对方式,自尊水平和自我效能感越低的贫困生越倾向于退避、幻想以及自责等不成熟的消极的应对方式。结论:行为应对方式越积极,自尊和自我效能感越高,行为应对方式越消极,自尊和自我效能感越低。Objective: To provide guidance for colleges carry out the work of mental health education of poor students.Methods: This study based on a questionnaire survey conducted among the impoverished students with the employment of Self-esteem Scale,General Self-Efficacy Scale and Coping Style Scale.Result: The result turns out to be as follows: The difference between impoverished and non-impoverished students in terms of self-esteem and self-efficacy makes no sense in statistics.The impoverished students with higher level of self-esteem and self-efficacy tend to cherish more mature and positive coping styles such as to appeal,to rationalize and to solve;while those with lower level of self-esteem and self-efficacy tend to have immature and negative coping strategies such as to withdraw,to fancy or to remorse.Conclusions: When students' coping styles become more positive,their self-esteem and self-efficacy goes higher accordingly.Similarly,when their coping styles are less positive,the self-esteem and self-efficacy they can enjoy also goes lower.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3