检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第12期1385-1386,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:基金项目:汕头市重点科技计划项目[汕府科(2010)63号]
摘 要:目的探索综合性干预措施在神经症患者护理中的作用。方法48例神经症住院患者随机分为对照组(药物治疗)和观察组(药物治疗加综合性干预措施)各24例,分别于治疗前、治疗后(8周后)评定焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)。结果治疗前,两组患者SAS、SDS比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后,观察组SAS、SDS减分率优于对照组,组问比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),观察组临床疗效优于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论综合性干预措施能有效改善神经症患者抑郁、焦虑情绪,提高治愈率,促进疾病的康复。Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention technique in neuroses nursing. Methods 48 inpatient neuroses were randomly divided into observation group (drug treatment and comprehensive intervention technique) and control group (drug treatment), using self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) to evaluate clinical symptoms before and after 2 months treatment. Results Before treatment, SAS and SDS scores between two patient groups had no statistic difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ), but after 2 months treatment, the observation group had lower SAS and SDS scores than the control group, the difference were obvious ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions Comprehensive intervention technique was useful in neuroses nursing which can ameliorate depression and anxiety emotions, improve illness recover.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.190