前列地尔注射液对老年患者外周静脉血管疼痛刺激的研究  

Study on pain stimulation of Alprostadil by drop infusion or intravenous injection on pain stimulation in peripheral vessels of elderly patients

作　　者：李敏[1] 甘和英[1] 罗红英[1] 高兴兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省医学科学院四川省人民医院老年病房,成都610072

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第12期1453-1455,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的研究前列地尔注射液（商品名凯时）在静脉注射和静脉滴注时对老年患者外周静脉血管的疼痛刺激。方法选取100例使用凯时治疗的老年患者，随机进入观察组和对照组，观察组46例，采用静脉推注凯时，对照组54例采用静脉滴注凯时，观察两种注射方式对外周静脉血管的疼痛刺激。结果凯时在静脉推注时对老年患者外周静脉血管的疼痛刺激较弱，疼痛持续时间较短；在静脉滴注时发生疼痛刺激反应较强，疼痛持续时间较长，两种注射方法不良反应发生率比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论老年患者使用凯时治疗时宜静脉推注。Objective To investigate the effect of Alprostadil by drop infusion or intravenous injection on pain stimulation in peripheral vessels of elderly patients. Methods One hundred patients were selected, among which 46 cases were treated with Alprostadil by intravenous, 54 by intravenous injection, the outcome of different treatment methods were analyzed in terms of the pain stimulation in peripheral vessels, the correlation between the duration of the pain and the duration of stimulation of peripheral vessels by Alprostadil, and other adverse effects. Results Compared to intravenous drop infusion, the duration of pain stimulation by intravenous injection is relatively shorter. In addition, fewer patients experienced pain during infusion. On occasion when pain occurred, it lasted for a shorter time. However, there is no obvious difference in adverse effects by two methods（P 〈 0. 05）. Conclusions Intravenous injection is superior to intravenous drop infusion to treat elderly patients with Alprostadil.

关 键 词：前列地尔 老年患者 外周血管 疼痛刺激 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]