检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《江西财经大学学报》2011年第3期56-61,共6页Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:监管机构如何对问题保险公司实施监管干预是一个紧迫的现实问题。在中英两国案例研究的基础上发现:监管干预行动都存在迟滞现象。监管机构给予问题保险公司较高的监管容忍度。原则导向与规则导向方式在监管实务中都是不可或缺的。监督力量在干预行动中发挥着重要作用。应该增加保险保障基金公司的监管权,建立监管干预决策的问责机制,建立及时的市场信息披露制度,激励多种监督力量参与干预行动,建立规则导向与原则导向相互融合的监管模式。How to implement regulatory intervention on the problemsome insurance companies by regulators is a pressing practical problem.Based on the case studies from both countries of UK and China,this paper discovers that there exists a lagging behind phenomenon in taking regulatory interventive actions.The regulatory bodies would always give higher regulatory tolerance to the problemsome insurance companies.Both the principle-oriented and the rule-oriented methods are indispensable in the practice of regulation.The regulatory force is playing an important role in the intervention actions.This study offers the following suggestions: to increase the regulatory power of the Insurance Guaranty Fund Companies,to establish the accountability mechanism for decisions of regulatory intervention,to establish a timely market information disclosure system,to stimulate different kinds of regulatory powers to take part in the interventive actions and to establish the combined regulatory mode of both rule-oriented and principle-oriented.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117