意义的非事实论与规范性——规则遵循问题的语义分析  

The Non-factualism of Meaning and Normativity:Semantic Analysis of Rule-following Problem

作　　者：郭贵春[1] 赵晓聃[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心 [2]山西大学哲学社会学学院

出　　处：《哲学研究》2011年第5期46-54,128,共9页Philosophical Research

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"规则遵循相关问题的语义分析及语境解释"(编号10YJC720065)成果之一

摘　　要：规则遵循悖论（therule—following paradox）及其相关问题源于维特根斯坦的《哲学研究》，它是后期维特根斯坦论述语言的运用及其意义方面的一个重要议题。克里普克在《维特根斯坦论规则和私人语言》中对该问题进行了系统阐释并提出了怀疑论解决方案。在这一解决方案中，他暂且接受意义归因中语义事实的缺失和怀疑论论证的结论，同时拒绝扩展这种论证而导致彻底的意义怀疑论。The rule-following problem has a very important place in later Wittgenstein,and Kripke's skeptical solution to the rule-following paradox implies meaning skepticism and non-factualism of meaning.This paper analyzes the disadvantages and flaws in some representative viewpoints of the argumentation,and then reveals the dilemma in theoretical coherence in the non-factualism from a semantic perspective.It takes the non-factualism as closely related to the problem of normativity.However,'normativity'has been interpreted in a variety of ways and this topic is liable to raise controversy.By analyzing and comparing the different aspects and levels of normativity,we can clarify the basic connotations of normativity and probe into the nature of it.

关 键 词：语义分析 意义 后期维特根斯坦 《哲学研究》 私人语言 怀疑论 克里普克 论证 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]