新制度经济学：修正还是革命  

The New Institutional Economics:Retouch Or Revolution

作　　者：刘志广[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海行政学院经济学教研部,上海200233

出　　处：《学术月刊》2011年第5期87-95,共9页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：新制度经济学对新古典经济学是修正还是革命的争议对新制度经济学未来发展非常重要。从经济学是"选择的理论"还是"交换的理论"的"罗宾斯-布坎南经济学定义之争"中,我们可以梳理出新古典经济学研究"范式"或"硬核"的四大方面,即新古典经济学是"选择的理论",新古典经济学的中心理论是资源配置理论,新古典经济学以孤立个人主义为基本方法论,新古典经济学以均衡分析和最优化理论为基础。这就为判断新制度经济学对新古典经济学是修正还是革命提供了判断依据。混合模式的内在缺陷使新制度经济学不可能在新古典经济学的研究范式下得到真正的发展。新制度经济学将历史和制度纳入分析当中,从而部分回到了古典政治经济学的传统,并与布坎南定义的"交换的理论"保持了一致。因此,新制度经济学需要树立自觉的革命意识,在"交换的理论"框架下完成统一,以形成强有力的思想体系。宪政经济学是新制度经济学发展的最后归宿。The choice between retouch and revolution for the new institutional economics vs. neoclassical economics is very important for the development of new institutional economics in the future. We can sum up four characters of the paradigm of neoclassical from the debate between Robbins and Buchanan on the definition of economics that economics is a theory of choice or a theory of exchange： neoclassical economics is a theory of choice; the center theory of neoclassical economics is the theory of resource allocation; the fundamental methodology is isolated individualism; the equilibrium analysis and the theory of optimization is very important for neoclassical economics. These four characters provide the judgment standard on retouch or revolution on neoclassical economics. The new institutional economics could not have development space in the paradigm of neoclassical economics for the inherent vice of mixed-models. The new institutional economics need self-conscious revolution and finish unification under the paradigm of the theory of exchange. The end-result of the new institutional economics is the constitutional economics.

关 键 词：新制度经济学 新古典经济学 修正 革命 

分 类 号：F08[经济管理—政治经济学]