检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院
出 处:《中国人民大学学报》2011年第3期146-153,共8页Journal of Renmin University of China
摘 要:举报是公民监督权的表现形式,是公民参与社会政治生活的重要渠道。检察机关举报工作由于其很强的实务性和秘密性,多年来一直是检察实践部门进行研究和探索,尚缺乏来自学术界的客观深入的理论性剖析,其研究视角难免存在一定的局限性。检察机关在目前的举报工作中仍然面临一些现实的困境,如举报与信访工作界限不清、举报线索泄露、举报人保障机制缺乏等等。在分析困境成因的基础上可以发现,法律化和制度化是检察机关举报工作的必然选择。Public tip-off is a form of the citizen's supervision and an important channel of the citizen participation in the social and political life.Because of its strongly secret and practical nature of the procuratorial organ's work on tip-offs,for many years,it is only on self-study and self-exploration with some inevitable limitations,and is lack of more objective analysis in other academic and theoretical areas as "external viewer".In present,the procuratorial organ's work on tip-offs still faces some real difficulties,such as ill-defined work between tip-offs and letters and visits from the people,leak of tip-off clues,lack of whistleblower protection mechanism.After analyzing the difficulties of tip-off work,we can know,only the legalization and the systemization can the procuratorial organ's work on tip-offs have a better development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117