基于德尔菲法的《冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表》条目筛选  

Apply of Delphi in Items Sift of the Scale of Stable Angina(the Syndrome of Phlegm and Blood Stasis in TCM)

作　　者：刘丽星[1] 张哲[2] 杜蕊[2] 张会永[2] 陈智慧[1] 杨关林[2] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁中医药大学第一临床学院,辽宁沈阳110032 [2]辽宁中医药大学附属医院,辽宁沈阳110032

出　　处：《辽宁中医杂志》2011年第5期827-829,共3页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家科技部重大新药创制专项课题(2009ZX09502-29)

摘　　要：目的:为制定冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表,筛选、优化条目。方法:采用德尔菲(Delphi)法,在前期研究基础上编制《冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表专家问卷调查表》,向全国40余位专家发送3次问卷调查,并对其中第3轮问卷结果进行分析。结果:第3次调查问卷发出43份,收回有效问卷40份,专家积极系数为93.02%,专家总体权威系数为88.31%,专家意见的总体协调系数W为0.57,P<0.05。量表分疾病、体质2个维度,删除3个条目,确定胸痛、胸闷、诱因、运动耐量、气短、唇舌青紫、四肢沉重7个条目。结论:专家代表性强,积极性高,权威程度、协调性好,应用Delphi法对《冠心病稳定型心绞痛(痰瘀互结证)自评量表》条目筛选的结果可取。Objective：This study aim to develop a stable angina （the syndrome of phlegm and blood stasis） self rating scale, sift items and get item weight. Methods ： Delphi method was applied to this research. All questionnaires were designed based on the former research and distributed to more than 40 experts 3 times. The results in the third times of survey were analyzed. Results ： Totally 40 valid questionnaires were received ,while 43 issued. The experts＇ activity index was 93.02% ,experts generally coefficient of authoritative was 88.31% ,The eoneent ration and coordination degree of the opinions of the expert s on this book was obviously high, W 0. 57, P 〈 0. 05. After the third Delphi process, there is 2 dimensions. 3 items were deleted and 7 items were-retained and translated into colloquial questions. Conclusion ： The reliability and coordination of the experts＇ advice is regarded to be high and harmonious. The result of sifting items constructed by Delphi is available.

关 键 词：德尔菲法 自评量表 冠心病 稳定型心绞痛 痰瘀互结 

分 类 号：R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]