体育专业大学生防御方式性别差异的元分析  

Meta-Analytic Review on Gender Difference of Defensive Style of College Students with Physical Education Major

作　　者：徐守森[1] 韩桂凤[1] 孙经伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都体育学院,北京100191

出　　处：《首都体育学院学报》2011年第3期281-284,共4页Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports

摘　　要：为了解体育专业大学生的防御方式是否存在性别差异。采用元分析的方法,对4篇研究进行统计分析,比较体育专业大学生在3种防御方式和掩饰因子得分上的性别差异。结果表明:不成熟防御方式d-value为-0.15,95%CI为-0.25^-0.04;成熟防御方式d-value为-0.11,95%CI为-0.23~0.01;中间型防御方式d-value为-0.25,95%CI为-0.38^-0.13;掩饰因子d-value为0.10,95%CI为-0.03~0.22。最后得出结论:体育专业大学生的不成熟防御方式和中间型防御方式,女生略高于男生;成熟防御方式和掩饰因子,不存在性别差异。Objective：To explore the gender difference of defensive style of college students with physical education major.Method：using meta-analytic method to calculate 4 studies.Results：d-value of immature defense style is-0.15,95% CI is-0.25～-0.04;d-value of mature defense style is-0.11,95% CI is-0.23～0.01;d-value of intermediate/neurotic defense style is-0.25,95% CI is-0.38～-0.13,d-value of image distorting factor is 0.10,95% CI is-0.03～0.22.Conclusion：In the immature and intermediate/neurotic defense style,the score of female students is slightly higher than that of male college students with physical education major;and there is no gender difference in the mature defensive style and image distorting factor between male and female college student with physical education major.

关 键 词：防御方式 元分析 大学生 体育专业 性别差异 

分 类 号：G807.4[文化科学—体育训练]