违约精神损害赔偿研究——理论反思与制度建构  

Compensation of Mental Damage for Breach of Contract——Theory Reflection and System Construction

作　　者：刘廷华[1] 

机构地区：[1]宜宾学院政府管理学院,四川宜宾644000

出　　处：《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第3期137-141,共5页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：四川省教育厅科研项目(10SB058)

摘　　要：对于违约精神损害赔偿,基于精神损害专属于侵权法、防止滥诉、难以量化、违反可预见性以及带有惩罚性等理由,目前的通说仍持反对意见。但以上理由无一成立。相反,违约精神损害赔偿完全符合合同法的立法宗旨,也是完善精神损害赔偿制度的必然要求,它能更好地保护当事人的合法权益,有利于鼓励交易;而且,英、美、德、法等很多国家的立法例都在一定范围内对违约精神损害赔偿予以承认。因此,我国也应允许违约精神损害赔偿,并在此基础上完善相关制度。At present mental damages for breach of contract are classified exclusively as tort law issue and means of litigation prone to be abused,and they are deemed difficult to quantify,liable to be violated,and punitive.They are opposed by the main stream society in China.However,research shows that none of those reasons can be substantiated.On the contrary,mental damages for breach of contract are in full compliance with the legislative purpose of contract law,and it is necessary to improve the system of mental damages to better protect the legitimate rights and encourage trading.Therefore,mental damages for breach of contract shall first of all be recognized in our country as this is a general means practiced by many countries like Britain,U.S.,Germany,France and others,and the systems for such practice shall be established and improved in China.

关 键 词：精神损害赔偿 侵权行为 侵权责任 违约责任 合同法 侵权法 归责原则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]