检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学,北京100124 [2]山东交通学院,山东济南250357
出 处:《工程抗震与加固改造》2011年第2期89-95,共7页Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting
基 金:故宫博物院科研基金项目(KT2007-4)
摘 要:为探究中国古代大木作结构抗震加固的有效方法,分别采用马口铁和CFRP加固榫卯节点,研究了节点加固前后构架的抗震性能。制作了1∶8缩尺比例的木结构空间模型,通过进行低周反复加载试验,获得了构架加固前后的力-侧移曲线,并对比分析了相应的骨架曲线、耗能能力、刚度退化、变形能力等抗震指标。结果表明:马口铁和CFRP均可提高构架的刚度和承载力,且加固后的构架仍有很好的变形性能,但是耗能能力则不如加固前;另一方面,CFRP加固榫卯节点的效果优于马口铁。To get effective strengthening method for Chinese ancient wooden structures,both iron hook and CFRP are considered to strengthen tenon-mortise joints of Chinese ancient structures,and aseismic behaviors of them after strengthened are studied.Models with a scale of 1:8 of the prototype structure are built considering tenon-mortise connections.By low cyclic reversed loading tests,load-displacement hysteretic curves of the structures are obtained;By analysis their skeleton curves,energy dissipation capability,stiffiness degradation as well as deformation performance are also studied.Results show that both iron hook and CFRP can enhance strength and stiffness of the structure,which remains good deformation performance after strengthened,but energy dissipation capability decreases;On the other hand,CFPR performs better than iron hook in strengthening tenon-mortise joint.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.195.35