两种包皮去除环在小儿包皮环切术中的应用体会  

Comparison of curative effects between Holy-loop circumcision and CBV-loop circumcision in children

作　　者：樊念念 刘勇[2] 王鹏[2] 靳风烁[2] 张克勤[2] 聂志林[2] 

机构地区：[1]军事经济学院襄樊分院门诊部,湖北襄樊441021 [2]第三军医大学大坪医院泌尿一科

出　　处：《西南国防医药》2011年第5期506-508,共3页Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China

摘　　要：目的比较两种包皮去除环在小儿包皮环切术中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析425例患儿行圣环切除(A组),445例患儿行CBV钟式包皮去除环切除(B组)的临床资料;对比两组患儿手术时间、术中术后出血量、术后并发症情况。结果两组患儿术中及术后出血量无统计学差异(P>0.05),B组在包皮环脱落时间、术后感染率、术后疼痛情况等方面优于A组(P<0.05),但其手术时间长于A组(P<0.05)。结论在小儿包皮去除环中,CBV包皮去除环效果优于圣环,值得临床推广。Objective To compare curative effects between Holy-loop circumcision and CBV-loop circumcision in children.Methods 870 children with phimosis or redundant prepuce were enrolled in this study.Among them,425 patients received Holy-loop circumcision（group A）,while other 445 ones received CBV-loop circumcision（group B）.Operative time,intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume,and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume had no significant differences between group A and B.Group B had shorter shedding time of annulus praeputialis,lighter postoperative pain and lower infection rate of incision than those in group B（P0.05）,although it had longer operative time（P0.05）.Conclusion CBV-loop appears to have better effectiveness than Holy-loop on child circumcision.Therefore,it is worth clinical promotion.

关 键 词：包皮 包茎 包皮环切术 小儿 

分 类 号：R691.1[医药卫生—泌尿科学]