检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方乐[1]
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2011年第3期26-35,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目<维护司法公正与社会公平正义研究>(10zd&043)阶段性成果之一
摘 要:当下中国的能动司法要充分发挥其积极作用并同时避免不利的实践与后果,就必须要恪守能动司法的限度;也即要处理好"能动"地司法与"依法"司法之间的关系,并在此基础之上型构起能动司法的边界。因而,这不仅意味着,当下中国司法场域里的能动司法,必须要认真对待法治的基本原则,甚至是"法条主义";而且也意味着当下中国的司法改革,必须要摆脱长期以来西方二元对立的司法知识观对中国司法裁判与司法发展的宰制,以一种新的、当然也是适合于中国社会的司法知识观来引领中国的司法发展。The function of the contemporary Chinese judicial activism to give full play to its positive role and at the same time avoid adverse practice and consequences, it must adhere to the judicial activism's limit, it means we should deal well with the relationship between the "activism" and "legaltimate" , and construct the judicial boundary of the judicial activism. Not only does it mean that, the contemporary Chinese judicial activism should be taken seriously and the rule of law basic principles, even the "Olegalism" , But also means that contemporary Chinese judicial reform must get rid referee of western binary judicial knowledge to chinses judical and the development. It also means we should suitable for the Chinese society of judicial knowledge view to guide Chinese .judicial development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.35.244