国家协调说与需要国家干预说之比较——兼谈我之经济法观  

Comparative Study on National Harmonization and National Intervention Needed——Additional Talking about my Opinions

作　　者：岳文婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]中北大学人文社会科学学院法学系,山西太原030051

出　　处：《河北理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第3期34-36,43,共4页Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：国家协调说、需要国家干预说是经济法学界的两种影响比较大的学说,首先对这两种学说的异同进行了分析和比较,提出两种学说有三个方面共同点,主要表现在都承认市场失灵、都将经济法界定为社会本位法、都认为协调或干预要以尊重客观经济规律为前提;同时认为它们的主要分歧之点在于对经济法的产生、立论点、性质、调整对象、法律责任的认识不同。在比较分析的基础上,提出我国经济法应以"协调干预论"概括更为科学,因为这样的概括就将学界公认的经济法的两大部分市场规制法和宏观调控法的精神都包含在内。最后本文对经济法的一些基础问题提出了自己的看法。National Harmonization and National Intervention Needed are two deeply influential doctrines in the region of economic law.The article analyses and compares their common ideas and different ideas firstly,and thinks there are three common ideas：they acknowledge market inefficiency,they think that economic law is society standards law,they also confirm Harmonization or Intervention must respect objective economical regulations as a first notice.The article thinks their different ideas lie in the production,the base of argument,the quality,the adjusting object,the law responsibility and so on.On the base of comparison,it comes up with a new opinion that our national economic law should be called as ＂National Harmonization and Intervention＂which is more scientific.because it includes two major portions＇spirit that are market regulation law and macro-control law recognized by all.At last,it express some opinions about the basic questions of economic law.

关 键 词：国家协调说 需要国家干预说 经济法 基本理论 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]