检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵长江[1,2]
机构地区:[1]重庆邮电大学法学院,重庆400065 [2]西南政法大学法学院,重庆400031
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2011年第3期21-25,共5页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
摘 要:我国司法鉴定质证程序自《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》颁布后并没有显著改变,鉴定人不出庭和对鉴定意见质证流于形式的问题仍然存在。究其原因,从宏观上看是诉讼制度的问题,从微观上看是鉴定意见质证本身的缺陷。解决这一问题,在宏观上应当在诉讼程序中建立和完善证据开示制度、交叉询问制度;在微观上应建立异议和关键鉴定意见强制出庭制度,明确不出庭的后果,规范质证规则和内容,并建立专家辅助人制度。No remarkable changes have taken place in cross-examination of forensic appraisal since the implementation of the "Decision on the Administration of Forensic Appraisal".The problems still remain where appraisers do not appear in court and the cross-examination is merely a formality.From a macroscopic view,it is a problem of the procedure system;from a microscopic view,it arises from the defects of the cross-examination system.To resolve these problems,the system of discovery and cross-examination should be built in the litigation procedure.The compulsory appearance with clear unfavorable consequences against challenged for key appraisal opinions,the rules of cross-examination,and the expert assistant system should also be established in law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31