论存疑无罪判决生效后的重新起诉  

On Renewed Prosecution after Dubious Not Guilty Adjudicates

作　　者：蒋赛静[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《广东第二师范学院学报》2011年第2期26-31,共6页Journal of Guangdong University of Education

摘　　要：存疑无罪判决生效后,检察机关依据"新的事实、证据"重新起诉虽然有一定的现实意义,但是不利于保障人权及实现诉讼效益。刑事诉讼一事不再理原则作为保障生效裁判既判力的重要原则,是限制重复追诉的理论基础,可以对重新起诉进行规制。我国应当确立以"同一事实行为"为"一事"标准的一事不再理原则;正确定位存疑无罪判决,使其具备充分的既定力与公信力;将重新起诉导入再审程序,使其从常态转为例外;同时还应对再审启动所依据"新的事实、证据"作出明确限定。After dubious not guilty adjudicates become effective,the procuratorial organs can still prosecute with new facts and evidence.Although it has some practical significance,it is unfavorable to safeguard human rights or achieve litigation benefits.＂Non Bis in Idem＂ as a principle aims to guarantee the effect of res judicata,can be used to restrict renewed prosecution.＂Non Bis in Idem＂ shall be established in China.The dubious not guilty adjudicates should be correctly positioned to make it forceful and credible.The renewed prosecution should be transferred into retrial procedure,to make it exception rather than normality.At the mean while ＂new facts and evidence＂ should be explicitly defined.

关 键 词：存疑无罪判决 重新起诉 一事不再理原则 再审 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]